B+88%
Quality Score
16
Pages
26
Issues
7.5
Avg Confidence
6.5
Avg Priority
1 Critical11 High14 Medium
>_ Testers.AI
AI Analysis
Felicis Ventures scored B+ (88%) with 26 issues, ranking #31 of 47 VC sites. That's 3 more than the 22.7 category average (32nd percentile).
Top issues to fix immediately: "Extremely Poor Readability - Text Too Small and Low Contrast" — Increase minimum font size to at least 14px for table content, ensure contrast ratio of at least 4; "Incomplete form with required dropdown fields not populated" — Either: (1) Pre-populate all dropdown fields with default selections so the benchmark can be immediately viewed, or (...; "Table Layout Breaks Vertical Spacing - Content Compressed" — Increase row height with minimum 24-32px padding, add vertical margin between rows (8-12px), or implement striped row....
Weakest area — accessibility (5/10): Color contrast issues in some sections, potential ARIA label gaps, and form fields may not be properly labeled for screen readers.
Quick wins: Improve color contrast ratios throughout the site to meet WCAG AA standards, especially in light purple sections. Add clear, descriptive ARIA labels and ensure all form inputs have associated labels for screen reader users.
Qualitative Quality
Felicis Ventures
Category Avg
Best in Category
Pages Tested · 16 screenshots
Homepage
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
www.felicis.com
Detected Issues · 26 total
1
Extremely Poor Readability - Text Too Small and Low Contrast
CRIT P9
Prompt to Fix
The issue is that the company listing table has text that is too small (below 12px) and insufficient contrast ratio for accessibility compliance. Fix it by increasing the minimum font size to 14px and ensuring a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for all text elements.
Why it's a bug
The screenshot shows a table with company listings where the text is extremely small and difficult to read. The font size appears to be well below standard readability thresholds (likely less than 12px). Combined with what appears to be low contrast between text and background, this creates a significant accessibility barrier that violates WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards for font size (minimum 12px for body text) and contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text). This affects usability for all users, particularly those with visual impairments.
Why it might not be a bug
This could be intentional for a dense data display, though it would still violate accessibility standards.
Suggested Fix
Increase minimum font size to at least 14px for table content, ensure contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 between text and background, implement responsive design to allow zoom/scaling without loss of functionality, or provide a toggle for 'comfortable' vs 'compact' view modes.
Why Fix
Improves accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA), enhances user experience for all users, reduces eye strain, and makes the content usable for people with low vision or visual impairments.
Route To
Frontend/UI Engineer, Accessibility Specialist
Page
Tester
Sharon · Security TesterTechnical Evidence
Elements:
<table>, <td>, <th>, body text stylingConsole:
No console errors visiblePage Text:
Our companies [table with company listings]2
Incomplete form with required dropdown fields not populated
HIGH P8
Prompt to Fix
The issue is that the benchmark form has multiple unfilled required dropdown fields that prevent the user from viewing any benchmark data, creating a broken first-time user experience. Fix it by either pre-populating these fields with sensible defaults, clearly disabling the SHOW BENCHMARK button with visual feedback, or allowing the benchmark to load with partial data to enable exploration.
Why it's a bug
The benchmark form displays multiple required dropdown fields with placeholder text ('select a series', 'select a sector', 'select a sales motion', 'select revenue range', 'select select valuation range') that appear to require user selection before the benchmark can be displayed. The 'SHOW BENCHMARK' button is visible but appears disabled or non-functional without these selections being made. This creates a broken user experience where the primary call-to-action cannot be completed.
Why it might not be a bug
The dropdowns may be intentionally designed to require selection, which is standard form behavior. However, if the button is disabled and not visibly indicating this to the user, it's a UX issue.
Suggested Fix
Either: (1) Pre-populate all dropdown fields with default selections so the benchmark can be immediately viewed, or (2) Clearly disable the 'SHOW BENCHMARK' button with a visual indicator (grayed out) and tooltip explaining what selections are required, or (3) Provide example benchmark data without requiring all fields to be populated.
Why Fix
Users landing on this page expect to see benchmark comparisons immediately. The current state prevents them from exploring the feature without mandatory selections, reducing engagement and usability.
Route To
Frontend Engineer / Product Manager
Page
Tester
Sharon · Security TesterTechnical Evidence
Elements:
<button>SHOW BENCHMARK</button>, <select> dropdowns with placeholder textPage Text:
We are a select a series company in the select a sector sector. We have a select a sales motion sales motion, select revenue range in revenue, and a select select valuation range valuation.3
Table Layout Breaks Vertical Spacing - Content Compressed
HIGH P8
Prompt to Fix
The issue is that table rows are vertically compressed with insufficient padding, making entries hard to distinguish. Fix it by increasing row height to minimum 24-32px and adding 8-12px vertical margins between rows.
Why it's a bug
The table appears to have inadequate row height and vertical padding, causing the entries to be vertically compressed. Each row lacks sufficient whitespace, making it difficult to distinguish between individual company entries and reducing scanability of the list. This is a clear usability issue for dense tabular data where proper spacing is essential for readability.
Why it might not be a bug
Compact spacing could be intentional for showing many items, though it sacrifices usability.
Suggested Fix
Increase row height with minimum 24-32px padding, add vertical margin between rows (8-12px), or implement striped rows with alternating background colors to improve visual separation between entries.
Why Fix
Improves readability, makes the list easier to scan, reduces cognitive load when reviewing multiple company entries, and provides better visual hierarchy.
Route To
Frontend/UI Engineer
Page
Tester
Sharon · Security TesterTechnical Evidence
Elements:
<tr>, <td> padding and height stylingConsole:
No console errors visiblePage Text:
Company listing rows